|
Sometimes a protolanguage can be identified with a historically known language. Thus, provincial dialects of Vulgar Latin gave rise to the modern Romance languages, so the *Proto-Romance language is more or less identical with Latin. Similarly, Old Norse was the ancestral of Norwegian, Swedish, Danish and Icelandic. Sanskrit was the protolanguage of many of the languages of the Indian subcontinent, such as Bengali, Hindi, Marathi, and Urdu. Further back in time, all these ancestral languages descended, in turn, from one common ancestor. We call this ancestor *Proto-Indo-European (PIE). Language families can be subdivided into smaller units called branches. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How do linguists establish relationships among languages?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
What if the ancestral language left no records?
It is clear that the word for 'water' looks very similar within each group, but not so similar across groups. Languages in the first group belong to the Germanic branch of the Indo-European language family. Languages in the second group belong to the Slavic branch. Although there are no written records of the ancestral *Proto-Germanic or *Proto-Slavic languages, we have to assume that these two ancestral languages must have existed, just like Latin did. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Where do these mystery languages belong?
As it turns out, Latvian belongs to the Baltic branch of the Indo-European language family, Albanian has no close relatives and does not belong to any branch within the Indo-European language family, and Basque does not belong to any language family at all. In fact, it is a language isolate, i.e., a language that cannot be reliably assigned to any family.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
What if there are no records, and we know little about the languages? In many parts of the world, there are no written records, and we don't know enough about the languages themselves. Consequently, we have to resort to grouping languages on the basis of geography. This is the case with many of the aboriginal languages of Australia, the native Indian languages of the Americas, the tribal languages of Africa, and countless other languages all over the world. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
How many language families are there? The largest language families are listed below. Together they account for nearly two-thirds of all languages and five-sixths of the world's population. The Indo-European language family has the largest number of speakers, followed by Sino-Tibetan. Niger-Congo has the largest number of languages, followed by Austronesian.
Additional large language families include the following:
There are no large language families in the Americas and in Australia. Instead, these continents have a large number of small language families consisting of languages with small numbers of speakers. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||